Susan R. Grayzel
In one of the more famous British
recruiting posters of the First World War, a young girl perched in her
father's lap asks: "What did you do in the Great War Daddy?" This image
implied that all men would want to be able to tell their children about
their military exploits during this extraordinary event. In many ways
the Women's Work Collection, now being made accessible to so many,
answers the question that a young child might have posed to his or her
mother or aunt, neighbour or elder sister, "What did you do in the Great
War?" The evidence assembled in this collection demonstrates that what
women did in the Great War was nearly everything.
Those who compiled the documents that form the core of
Women's Work Collection wanted to be able to tell future generations
about women's impressive, albeit largely non-military, exploits during
this transformative era. If men were to become soldiers, what was to
become of the women? In addition to their enduring responsibilities in
the home and for their families, millions of women in all participant
nations also took on a diverse and significant range of roles and
occupations for the duration of the war. By examining these letters
and reports, pamphlets and newspaper clippings, researchers will be able
to see the broad scope of women's activities and their growing
acceptance by the wartime state.
When what would become the Imperial War
Museum was established in 1917, the founders created a Women's Work
Subcommittee under the auspices of Agnes Conway, and its members got to
work in April 1917. Conway and Lady Priscilla Norman proved the most
dedicated members of the committee, and both had performed war work that
gave them some valuable insights into what women had done. Lady Norman
had helped run a hospital in France in 1914, and Agnes Conway had been
involved in aiding wounded Belgians (Wilkinson, 32:). The overall committee took as its main
objective the compilation of a thorough record of women's wartime
activities. In practice, this meant collecting material from every
identifiable women's organisation as well as from noteworthy
individuals. In addition to assembling an archive of written matter,
such as letters, reports and pamphlets, the committee sought
photographs, badges, art work and other material emblems of women's
wartime service. For example, the Women's Work Subcommittee sponsored
the first official British woman war artist in 1918, and that year
Victoria Monkhouse began to sketch women who had taken on such
previously all-male occupations as tram and bus drivers or window
cleaners (Wilkinson, 34). Given the enormity of their task, the Women's
Work Subcommittee quickly created its own sub-sections on such issues as
employment, relief work and medicine, and collectively they produced a
voluminous and rich archive.
The bulk of what would become the Women's
Work Collection was compiled by volunteer labour between 1917 and 1920,
but the earlier war years were not neglected. Agnes Conway proved an
invaluable aid to this effort. She wrote numerous letters to every
organisation that she could think of, asking for material to add to the
collection, and especially for descriptions of what women had
accomplished (Wilkinson, 34-35:).. As a result, the collection includes
materials that reveal a great deal — although not everything —about what
women did during the entire period between 1914 and 1920. Given that
the organisers were working under the auspices of Great Britain's
Imperial War Museum, the documents here emphasize the participation of
British women. However, it would be a mistake to think that the
collection could only tell us about them. It tells us an enormous
amount about women in many of the participant nations and about the
situation of women and men, soldiers and civilians in wartime society.
The list of
subject headings provides a glimpse of the widespread nature of the
matter covered by the collection. These topics include those that focus
on work done by or on behalf of a particular geographic region, ranging
from Belgium to Serbia, Czechoslovakia to the United States. The most
extensive heading covers "Employment" with a separate listing for
"Munitions," but detailed records are also grouped under such categories
as the "Army", "Benevolent Organisations", including everything from the
National Canine Defence League to the Y.W.C.A., "the British Red Cross
Society", "Food", "Land", "Relief Funds", and "Welfare." Among the most
under-utilized sources are the 460 pieces listed as "Local Records;"
here the activities of women from nearly every locale in Britain, listed
alphabetically from Abbey Wood (Kent) to York, have been preserved.
Hidden among them all are doubtless many local stories with national
implications waiting to be told.
The general subject headings not only
prove a tremendous aid to finding material but also reveal something of
the scope of women's contributions and what the Women's Work
Subcommittee deemed important. However, the documents contained within
them are the real gems. Students, researchers and future historians
will find here materials ranging from the papers detailing government
policy towards women's wartime labour to such things as the citations
for all women decorated and honoured for their wartime service by the
British government. The Women's Work Collection contains the records of
more than a hundred separate voluntary charitable organisations, among
them dozens devoted solely to aiding Belgian refugees. In addition,
press cuttings on all aspects of women's wartime experiences and the
personal reflections of such notable individuals as Dame Katherine Furse
help put the official records in a much broader and, at times, more
intimate context.
Some of the essays on specific subjects
that accompany this introduction will shed detailed light on particular
aspects of women's wartime experiences. Deborah Thom offers a thorough
overview of women's waged labour, especially in factories and in the
manufacturing of munitions. Both Joanna Bourke's and Kaarin
Michaelsen's essays help illustrate the extensive geographical range and
significance of women's medical services. Women's direct contributions
to the armed forces are explored in Lucy Noakes's piece on women and
military services, both official and voluntary. Two essays by
Jacqueline deVries illuminate the enormous diversity of women's
volunteer and charitable organisations as well as highlighting the often
neglected role of women's religious groups and their support of the war
effort. In addition, Laura E. Nym Mayhall places all of these
activities in the context of women's struggles for political rights,
especially suffrage, and Nicoletta F. Gullace shows how the entire
collection reveals the complicated meanings of women's patriotism.
Nearly everyone who has researched any aspect of the history of British
women during the First World War has relied on the Women's Work
Collection. By helping to make this invaluable resource more
widely available and providing new tools with which to search its
content, this project will be able to aid those writing more general
histories of Britain, World War One and women. The range of the
collection also provides us with material with which to explore issues
that continue to challenge us in the contemporary world, be they the
status of women in the military, the plight of refugees displaced from
war zones, the aid extended to the dependents of those serving in the
armed forces, or the most successful way to utilize the female
workforce. These are subjects that take us well beyond
Britain and the years 1914-1918.
War is still too often seen as a solely male experience and its history
largely written as if it only involved combatants. Given how much
changed with the first, modern, total war, neglecting the part played by
women leaves out vital information and makes for an incomplete story.
By showing us the women's part in the Great War, the Women's Work
Collection offers a vital counterbalance, demonstrating how women both
contributed and responded to this time of immense social, economic and
cultural upheaval.
Bibliography
Wilkinson, Mary. “Patriotism and duty: the Women’s
Work Collection at the Imperial War Museum.” The
Imperial War Museum Review
No. 6 (1991), 31-37.
Back to Top